“Frankenstein” movie adaptation by Guillermo del Toro: does it exceed expectations?

On October 17, the movie Frankenstein was released. It was a long-waited rendition of the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, a renowned classic known for being a pioneer novel in the genre of science fiction. 

Fans had high hopes for the movie: after all, the director is the one and only Guillermo del Toro, Mexican author and filmmaker known for his past works of Pan’s Labyrinth and Pinocchio. Many were hoping to see what they have not seen before from past Frankenstein movies — accuracy to the plot of the original novel. Other adaptations “Hollywood-ified” the appearance of The Creature, and dramatized the novel, almost past recognition.

After watching the movie, there were mixed opinions. Most can agree that the scenery, costumes, acting, and direction were superb. Actually, many were generally pleased with the appearance of The Creature, played by Jacob Elordi. However, critics pointed out that, while the themes of the movie may align with the book’s, the actual events don’t. Many are either exaggerated or made up for cinematic effect. At the same time, some events or facts are omitted entirely.

Fans of the movie argue that those who have not read the book, perhaps a large portion of the movie watchers, may be confused about the relevance of certain events from the novel — after all, some things only make sense in a book where things can be narrated and explained more clearly. 

In the end, while they may be different, both the book and movie versions of Frankenstein are exceptional works of art.